Friday, October 31, 2014

The Montreal Expos of 20??

With the Tampa Bay Rays having problems filling their stadium multiple years in a row now despite having a good team there have been multiple rumours surrounding the relocation of the team. There is really only one team on the list that I've heard and many people love hearing it. Could we see the re-emergence of the Montreal Expos sometime in the somewhat-distant-but-hopefully-not-too-distant future.


If this is going to happen there are a number of obstacles to get over and hoops to jump through. First of all, Montreal would likely need to build a brand new baseball stadium. This involves finding a space to put one, planning out how the stadium will look, and most importantly money. Since 2000 the cheapest stadium to be built cost $216M (PNC) and the most expensive cost $1.6B (New Yankee Stadium). Montreal probably wouldn't get a stadium for the price that Pittsburgh did anymore, but they wouldn't have to spend money like New York either. They would probably need around $500M-$800M. That would be a lot of money for a city to spend and there would be a large discussion about who pays for it. How much would the city chip in? The provincial government? The federal government? How much would the owner(s) have to pay? This also raises another issue. Are there owners willing to buy the team? And is the team even for sale?



To answer the second question first, the team does not appear to be for sale at this time. This puts a damper on Rays to Montreal rumours for now, but this post is more about the future. If the Rays continue to consistently have poor attendance, then one day a few years from now they very well could be for sale. Even now, despite not being for sale, owners and other baseball people know that Montreal is there wanting a team, and right now, Tampa is really the only market that would make sense to move. If the team ever did go for sale, I think that enough people want baseball in Montreal that some rich Canadian (who knows? Maybe even possibly an American) would be willing to buy  the team, and pending league approval move them to Montreal. The key words there might be "pending league approval."

When asked about the crowds Montreal drew to watch the Blue Jays play the Mets (more on that later) Bud Selig said the following "It did make a big impression. I was very impressed...I think (the exhibitions) were marvelous...I wish them well. And I think they would be an excellent candidate in the future, no question about it" (quote taken from the Toronto Sun). Bud Selig did also acknowledge that there would be difficulties. That obstacle is out of the way, as the MLB looks to be open to possible relocation to Montreal.

Another thing to keep in mind is the appetite for baseball in Montreal is alive and well. The Blue Jays played two exhibition games in Olympic stadium and drew over 90,000 people between the two games. People there would definitely support the team, not only in Montreal but Canada wide. Montreal is ready and waiting for a team.

Bottom Line: When will Montreal have a baseball team? It's hard to say if they ever will at this point. However, personally I do believe it will happen. It will likely take 2-3 more years of bad attendance from the Rays. It's hard to say if and when a stadium would be built, if they had to the team could likely play in Olympic Park for one season. We'll say a year of waiting for the park, even though that is hard to predict, there likely would be a little bit of a wait for the stadium to be built. Acquisition of the team might take a year or two, and maybe another year or two to make the move final. This puts us at roughly a five to eight year waiting period. I'd also add on one to three years for unknowns or things I might not have thought of. Now we're looking at six to eleven years, which I know is a pretty wide margin, but at this point with it being purely speculation it's hard to predict. However, if it's going to happen this would mean Montreal would have a baseball team by 2025 at the latest. Will it happen? Only time will tell.



What do you think of Montreal's chances of getting a team back? Let me know by either commenting below this post or find me on twitter @thewildman111


photo taken from toddradom.com





Monday, October 20, 2014

Yes Oilers Management Does Care About Winning



It's pathetic that I have to write a post to address questions about whether an organization cares about winning or not. It's ludicrous to even think it. For a variety of reasons the management of the Oilers obviously cares about winning, as does any organization.


First of all, the Oilers executives are members of the Oilers that were so dominant. I think these guys know a thing or two about winning. Don't the recent draft picks show that? Hall's a stud, Nugent-Hopkins looks like he will be a good centre, and say what you want about Yakupov, but the skill set is there for him to become something special. Aside from draft picks, don't the recent acquisitions also show a desire to win?

What was the Oilers biggest problem last season? Defense. So what does Craig MacTavish do this off-season? Acquires solid veteran defensemen. What did they need so badly at the start of last season? Goaltending. So he goes and gets two goalies with a lot of promise. Also lets not forget about trades like Paajarvi for Perron. You see, a team that didn't want to win wouldn't care about filling the teams needs and making good trades, and the Oilers GM has done that. Now, people will point to a lack of centre depth.

People, it was one off season. A GM can't always fill everything in one off season, especially with what was a fairly weak free agent market at centre. Any trade would likely mean giving up an arm and a leg. Is that what you want? To overpay at another position to get depth at another? This would also likely set back the Oilers playoff hopes even longer. Great idea. You see, putting this team together will take more time than you would like. That's the truth. MacTavish wasn't going to be able to accomplish everything in one offseason, but he got a lot of it done. Then these people will say "What about the hiring of Eakins?"

Okay, a rookie head coach might not have been the best decision, but remember this. Other NHL teams were after him. This wasn't an Oilers thing that they had their hearts set on a random nobody. Other teams also thought he was NHL ready and were after him at the same time. Remember, a lot of Oilers fans were actually happy about this signing. At the time, no one thought that hiring Eakins was "management not caring." Yes Eakins has and likely will take more time to figure out the NHL, however at the time we liked the signing, and like it or not he's the coach now. Management really truly was and is trying. Well what about Kevin Lowe staying?

NO NO NO NO NO. Kevin Lowe has nothing to do with the Oilers success or failure. MacTavish is clearly allowed to make the moves that he wants and Lowe is more of a behind the scenes guy. If Kevin Lowe were to be fired there would be no immediate impact on the ice one way or another. He's not playing, he's not coaching, he's not even deciding on trades or signings. What would be different if he left? Of course, people fail to see this logic and seem to think that firing Lowe is a magic gateway to success. The seats are already paid for. Management doesn't need to care.

Another big misconception. Yes, a large portion of the seats have already been paid for that much is true. However, if the team isn't winning and fans finally do decide not to show up a half empty arena won't look good on TV and then serious questions about management would start. Also, the seats might be paid for, but concessions aren't. If there's no one in the stadium then there is no one to buy ridiculously over priced drink and food. There is no one to buy jerseys. You see, for a variety of reasons the arena does need to be full, and if for no other reason other than this one, management does need to care.


-Darren


Do you think the Oilers management cares? Either comment below this blog, or find me on twitter @thewildman111


photo taken from oilers.nhl.com


Tuesday, October 14, 2014

NHL Expansion and/or Relocation

Very few people showed up for the Florida Panthers' home opener in Sunrise, Fla., on Saturday. Very few showed up on Monday night, either.
The crowd for the Florida Panthers home opener
There are a lot of cities whose names I have heard for relocation or expansion into the NHL. Relocation is especially reigniting right now because the Panthers drew a pathetic crowd of just over 7,300 fans for their home opener. Below is a list of cities in no particular order I've heard as a suggestion or possibility for expansion or relocation and then after I'll explain the chances of them getting a team.

A Saskatchewan team (either Regina or Saskatoon)
Halifax
Seattle
Oklahoma City
Quebec City
GTA (Greater Toronto Area)
Las Vegas
Cleveland


Saskatchewan
A team in Saskatchewan would have to be in one of the major cities, being Regina or Saskatoon. The positives they have going for them are the CHL teams draw good attendance. However, having a successful CHL team is a lot different from an NHL team. The major cities are too far apart, and I'm not sure either city is populated enough. I'm sure everyone would cheer for and support the team, but are there enough people who would be able to go to the games night after night? Not right now, neither city is that big and they are too far apart to be able to get people from both. I wouldn't rule out a Saskatchewan NHL team in the future after the cities have grown more, but right now I don't think it works.

Halifax
Halifax is a similar situation to Saskatchewan. The Atlantic coast has popular CHL teams, but again, supporting a CHL team and NHL team are different. Halifax and the rest of the coast probably have the population to support a team, but only so many people live close enough to be able to go night in and night out, and it likely wouldn't be enough people. I would rule Halifax as being unlikely to ever get a team, because they don't have growth the way the Saskatchewan cities might. There likely would never be enough people to support the team just because so many people would have to travel long distances to make it work, which is unlikely.

Seattle
I would list Seattle as a likely candidate to have an NHL team. They need a new arena, but once that issue is solved the fan base would be there. Seattle fans are passionate about sports and I believe would be  willing to support an NHL team. The fact that there is also potential for a rivalry with Vancouver would add to it. If they can get an arena Seattle is a strong candidate for an NHL team.

Oklahoma City
I don't think Oklahoma City could have a team. Basketball is the main sport there and the Oilers' farm team (the Barons) are there. I honestly believe the AHL is the highest level of hockey that can exist on OKC. An NHL team is almost definitely not in the near or even distant future for this city. If anything it would be something a long ways down the road, and something would have to change for it to work.

Quebec City
This is the city where most Canadian fans want to see a team. They are building an NHL sized arena, and are likely on the top of a lot of people's list for a team. The building doesn't guarantee anything, but it is a good sign. They would also have a good rivalry with the Canadiens. However, there is one reason that a Qubec team might be held back. Bettman. Gary Bettman has been pushing more for American expansion, and Quebec City is obviously Canadian. I don't think this will hold them back for too long though. The fan base is there, and soon an arena will be there, I would not at all be surprised if Quebec City gets a team soon.

GTA
A lot of people seem to think this is a good idea and it will work. I'm not completely sold on it. The arena's there, but I'm not sure if the fan base is. A lot of those people are Leafs fans and it's hard to convince people to change loyalties. I know some people would, but I can also see a consistently half empty arena. I would say it's 50/50 on them getting a team.

Las Vegas
This past summer there were some fairly serious rumors regarding a team in Vegas. It obviously hasn't happened, but I'm not so sure if it won't. There are some more attractive locations for a team than Vegas, but if you look at the California teams they have had a fair amount of success and a lot of fans. A Vegas team would have to be good to draw fans, the first couple years fans would have patience and as long as they improved they would draw fans over time. There are so many other places to go in Vegas which the NHL team might have to compete with and there is the possibility of being swallowed up by everything else that is in Vegas. However, there is also a chance that for whatever reason it excels. I think Vegas definitely in the running to have a team and I wouldn't count them out.

Cleveland
No, no, no, no, no, no, no. This literally would turn into the Cleveland Browns of the NHL. Cleveland teams and pro sports haven't mixed up until the Cavaliers getting Lebron back. Other than that though, the Browns are a failure, and between Lebron leaving and coming back so were the Cavs. Is the fan base there? Maybe, there might also be too many other teams close by which already have fans (Columbus and Pittsburgh). I think Cleveland is an all around bad idea and likely won't happen.



Bottom Line: Next round of expansion and relocation, who will have a team?
My answer is Seattle, Las Vegas, and Quebec City. Seattle is planning on building an NHL arena and as long as they can get it done I believe a team is as good as theirs. I know Vegas is a bit of a long shot, but with the Western Conference having two less teams, the NHL I believe would be looking to expand in the West before anywhere else and Vegas is the city in the West which likely makes the most sense. It will be tough, but I think it's possible, the only other way would be realignment, but I believe Detroit and Columbus would be  hesitant to leave the East, if they could be convinced at all. Quebec City would likely be a relocation of another Eastern Conference team such as Florida. They wouldn't take a Western team because they are already short two teams. Florida likely makes the most sense to move to Quebec and it wouldn't surprise me at all.



Who do you think is getting an NHL team next round of expansion and relocation? Comment below this post or find me on twitter @thewildman111


-Darren

photo taken from the National Post

Friday, October 3, 2014

Top 50 NHL Players

With TSN's annual top 50 players in the NHL coming out I thought I'd do my own top 50. So here we go. We'll see how I compare to TSN.

50. Corey Crawford CHI, 32-16-10, 2.26 GAA, .917 SV%
Crawford is a good goalie. However, it's hard to say if he's much more than that. His numbers are solid, but not the greatest, and he wins playing on a very good team. That being said he is good, and is worthy of the fiftieth best player in the NHL.


49. Gabriel Landeskog COL, 26 G, 39 A
Colorado has a lot of young kids making an impact and Landeskog is one of them. He's good on both sides of the puck and puts up a lot of points. He should just keep getting better.


48. Max Pacioretty MTL, 39 G, 21 A
Pacioretty was fourth in the league in goals last season, but just 44th in points. Some might say he should be higher because of the goals, but in order to get higher I think the total points would need to spike, and I think in order to be higher he needs to take more of a leadership role on the Canadiens. Right now it's Subban and Price, if one more person would step up, that would help them a lot. I believe Pacioretty could be that guy.


47. Jordan Eberle EDM, 28 G, 37 A
I know my bias might be showing with this one, but there is an argument to be had for Eberle. He has really good numbers and has shown in the past he is capable of a point per game or close to a point until he proves he can do it again though he's at number 47.


46. Oliver Ekman-Larsson ARI, 15 G, 29 A
This begins what will be a very long parade of young skilled defensemen. The things I'm about to say about Larsson you will hear a lot about the others as well. Larsson can put the puck in the net and play defense really well. He is a huge boost to the Coyotes and just expect him to get better.


45. Joe Pavelski SJS, 41 G, 38 A
You're probably wondering with stats like that why Pavelski is so low. Well, he's getting old and likely won't have the same production. There is also question marks surrounding the Sharks this year. There are a number of things that will likely factor into a lesser season for him. However, he is still a good player.


44.Nathan MacKinnon COL,24 G, 39 A
MacKinnon had a really good rookie season last year and just look for him to get better. Again it was one season, so I'm not getting too excited yet. However, he has a lot of promise and could really develop into something special.


43.Semyon Varlamov COL, 41-14-6 2.41 GAA, .927 SV%
Varlamov led all goalies in wins last season and put together a very good campaign. The only reason he isn't higher and a top goalie is because of one good season. It was his first season doing this. I believe he can repeat, but he needs to prove he can before he moves up the rankings.


42. Antti Niemi SJS, 39-17-7, 2.39 GAA, .913 SV%
Niemi has been a good goalie for the Sharks, winning them lots of games and putting up good numbers. He is definitely a legitimate NHL goalie.


41. Ryan McDonagh NYR, 14 G, 29 A
The Rangers young defenseman has helped them out a lot. He was a large part of last season, and their run to the Stanley Cup. Expect even better things from him than what we've already seen.


40. Joe Thorton SJS, 11 G, 65 A
Thorton has been one of the best set up men in the game. However, he's getting older, and questions around the Sharks team don't help either. He is still a very good player, but how much he has left, and what the Sharks can do will have to be seen yet this season.


39. Mark Giordano CGY, 14 G, 33A
This young defender out of Calgary is only going to get better. I wouldn't be surprised to see him much higher up on this list one day.

38. Kevin Shattenkirk STL, 10 G 35 A
There are a lot of young good defensemen in the league right now and Shattenkirk is one of them. He can both put up points and defend well.

37. Nicklas Backstrom WSH, 18 G, 61 A
Backstrom is a solid distributor of the puck and almost a point per game player. Playing with Ovechkin on offense probably doesn't hurt either.


36. Marc-Andre Fleury PIT, 39-18-5, 2.37 GAA, .915 SV%
Fleury has had some consistency issues, but he is still a good NHL goalie. He is still capable of doing well and being a quality goalie in the NHL.


35. Victor Hedman TB, 13 G, 42 A
Sometimes it must seem like Hedman is doing it all by himself in Tampa Bay. He is a very good defenseman who has been a major plus for the lightning.


34.  Phil Kessel TOR, 37 G, 43 A
In many ways Kessel is at times Toronto's biggest threat. He's a good goal scorer and contributes a lot there. He is nowhere close to best in the league, but he does have a lot of skill and can put the puck in the net.


33. Pavel Datsyuk, DET, 17 G, 20 A
Datsyuk seemed to be slowing down in a shortened season for him last year. He still has very soft hands, but how much he has left in the tank remains to be seen. He is still a top thirty player, but with so many young players leaving a mark and getting better I find it hard to see a guy like Datsyuk making it much higher on this list while being on the decline.


32. Zdeno Chara BOS, 17 G, 23 A
Chara seems to have lost a step recently, he isn't quite the dominant presence that he once was. He is still a top defenseman in the league, and he still has a massive shot from the point. His size and skill still make him a formidable opponent.


31. Jamie Benn DAL, 34 G, 45 A
Benn has been a very good player for Dallas and should just continue to get better. He can score, but he isn't afraid to go in the greasy areas either. He should continue to get better and better and will be a huge help for the Stars this season.


30. Brent Seabrook CHI, 7 G, 34 A
Seabrook is a very good shut down defenseman from Chicago. He puts up points and knows how to stop scoring threats. Definitely worthy of being on this list.

29. Ryan Suter MIN, 8 G, 35 A
Suter doesn't quite put up the same points, or play defense quite as well as some of the defensemen on this list, but he's very reliable. He plays consistently good defense, and can help out on offense. His biggest asset is eating minutes. Suter led all skaters in ice time averaging 29:24 in icetime per game.


28. Matt Duchene COL, 23 G, 47 A
A young centre out of Colorado who has really been a huge boost to an up and coming team. Watch out for Colorado to have another really good season, and Duchene should be a huge factor into it.


27. Keith  Yandle ARI, 8 G, 45A
Another young but solid defenseman. This time out of the desert. Again, he knows how to contribute on offense, but can also come back and play shut down defense.


26. David Krejci BOS, 19 G, 50 A
An excellent passer, and Krejci certainly doesn't have a shortage of people to pass to in Boston. Like so many players on the Bruins Krejci plays both sides of the puck well and also like the other Bruins he isn't afraid to take or deliver a hit either.


25. Patrick Sharp CHI, 34 G 44 A
Yet another Blackhawk on the list, that really tells you something about the team. Sharp is a well rounded forward who can both score and dish the puck. A very solid player who would do well on just about any team.


24.  Alex Pietrangelo STL, 8 G, 43 A
Young good defenders. St. Louis has a lot of them. Pietrangelo is one of them he can do a bit of everything. He can contribute on offense and plays really good defense.


23. Taylor Hall EDM, 27 G, 53 A
Hall has been consistently the best offensive threat in Edmonton. He isn't quite as good as some of the top forwards in the league yet, but he is the top left winger in the league. Right now he's top twenty, but in a year or two who knows how high he could be on this list?


22. Tyler Seguin DAL, 37 G, 47 A
For awhile it looked like Seguin might be a bust, however, he showed some promise in Boston and then really broke out in Dallas. He's put up a lot of points and will probably get better yet.

21. Patrice Bergeron BOS, 30 G, 32 A
Bergeron doesn't put up as many points as some guys on this list, but what he does put up he does so with consistency. What really puts him high on this list is the style of game he plays. He's an excellent two way centre who isn't afraid to take or deliver a hit.


20. Tukka Rask BOS, 36-15-6, 2.04 GAA, .930 SV%
Rask's numbers might be better than some of the guys mentioned earlier, but the reason he's a little bit lower is he didn't have to carry a team the way some of the others did, it's hard to say with a goalie who has such a good team how good his skill set is. However, that doesn't mean Rask isn't that good. He is still a very good goalie, who could potentially prove me wrong for having him this low.


19. Patrick Kane CHI, 29 G, 40 A
I don't think Kane is quite as good as some people do, a lot of people would have him higher yet. He is a very skilled forward and does a lot for Chicago. He can put up the points and all three players on that top line for Chicago are strong.


18. Erik Karlsson OTT, 20 G, 54 A
Some people will find this very low for Kaarlsson. However, his defense isn't as good as some and believe it or not defense is the main priority for a defenseman. That being said, Kaarlsson is a very good player and he led the league in defensemen for points for a reason.


17. Alex Ovechkin WSH, 51 G, 28 A
A lot of people think Ovechkin should be much higher than this. However for all the scoring he does is equally bad on defense. He is lazy in back checking and doesn't do much in his own end. Improve on defense and we'll talk about a higher ranking for him.


16. Henrik Lundqvist NYR, 33-24-5, 2.36 GAA, .920 SV%
Lundqvist is another very good goalie. He took the Rangers team on his back and led them to the Stanley Cup Finals. He was one of the only reasons they went that deep too. The Rangers are another team that could use some help, but their goaltending is extremely sound.

15. John Tavares NYI, 24 G, 42 A
Tavares has not consistently led the Islanders to the playoffs. Tavares needs to prove that he can stay healthy, and lead the Islanders to the playoffs, and potentially even win a series. He is a very skilled forward and is definitely one of the best in the league.

14.Corey Perry ANA, 43 G, 39 A
The first of Anaheim's dynamic duo. Perry didn't score quite as much as Getzlaf last year, however, that doesn't make him much less of a player. Perry is a very good player and there are very few things that he can't do.


13. Evgeni Malkin PIT, 23 G, 49 A
This might be a little low for Malkin, however, last season he didn't have as quite a good a season as he normally does which is why I put him lower. This doesn't mean though that he is any less of a threat than some other forwards. Last season was a decent season for Malkin, he is capable of much more than what he did last season though.

12. Anze Kopitar LA, 29 G, 41 A
Kopitar has really emerged as one of the NHL's top players for the Kings. He played a huge role in winning their Stanley Cup last year and is a major part of that team. Any team would love to have a guy like Kopitar.


11. Ryan Getzlaf, ANA, 31 G, 56 A
Getzlaf, and his partner Perry who you saw earlier in this list are one of the deadliest duos in the NHL. However, on their own both are skilled. Getzlaf was second in the NHL in points last season and he doesn't look like he's slowing down any time soon.

10. Johnathon Quick LA, 27-17-4, 2.07 GAA, .915 SV%
Last year was a solid season for Quick, after what was a bit of a down year the year before. It still wasn't as good as he has been in the past, but I still believe he is that goalie. These are good numbers, but he's also capable of better yet. Watch out for Quick, one of the best goalies in the NHL.


9. PK Subban, MTL 10 G, 43 A
The face of the Canadiens franchise. Subban is a big game player, with big game attitude. He knows how to distribute the puck and don't let his ten goals fool you. He may have only had ten, but his monster shot from the point is always a threat, especially on the power play. The only thing keeping him from being a higher rank is he can be reckless on defense and is susceptible to costly mistakes.


8. Claude Giroux PHI, 28 G, 58 A
Giroux had a really slow start to the season last year and still managed to score eighty six points. If he hadn't started so cold his numbers would be way up there. I would say that if anyone is going to give Crosby and Stamkos competition for points it might be Giroux. Yes, he is that good.


7. Drew Doughty LA, 10 G, 27 A
Doughty doesn't put up points the same way the some others do, but you could make a case for him being the best shut down defenseman in the NHL. He is a huge asset to LA, and probably knows how to stop power offenses from scoring better than anyone else.


6.Carey Price MTL, 34-20-5, 2.32 GAA, .927 SV. %
This might be a surprise to some, but I have no question that Price is the best goalie in the NHL, you can argue that he is the Canadiens heart beat. When Price went out in the playoffs last year the Canadiens just weren't the same. He "Careys" his team, puts up really good stats, and gets them wins. He could use some more help, but as it is now he can get them to the playoffs and win a couple rounds, any team would love a goalie that could get a team that far.

5. Johnathon Toews CHI, 28 G, 40 A
Toews doesn't quite put up the numbers as a lot of forwards do, but they are still good numbers. What makes him an extremely good player though is his leadership. When you combine the type of leadership he provides with his good numbers, he is definitely a top notch NHL player.


4. Duncan Keith CHI, 6 G, 55A
Right on the heels of Shea Weber is Duncan Keith. Both are shut down defensemen, who do their jobs very well. Keith doesn't score as much as Weber, and he doesn't need to carry the team the same way Weber does. However, Keith is a very hard hitter and can put out any offensive attack. Again, he is easily a top defenseman in the NHL.


3.Shea Weber NSH 23 G, 33A
Last season Weber was third among defensemen in scoring. He is easily one of the best shut down defensemen in the league and has put Nashville on his back multiple times. For the way he carries the team, his shut down ability, and the scoring threat he is with his hardest shot, Weber deserves the title as best defenseman in the league.


2. Steven Stamkos TB, 25 G, 15 A
Despite a major injury forcing him to miss most of the season, Stamkos is still the second best player in the NHL. He has scored sixty goals before and still has the ability to do it again. By the end of the season there's a chance he has passed Crosby for number one.


1. Sidney Crosby PIT, 36 G, 68 A
Crosby really is the obvious choice for number one. No one has dominated the game in the same way Crosby has and he should be due for another great campaign this season. I would say he is likely to hit 100 points again.


-Darren


Did I get my top 50 right? Wrong?  I know almost all of you disagree with something. Let me know what you think. Either comment below the blog post, or find me on twitter @thewildman111


photo taken from forbes.com